Find speakers by:
Request more info

Why I’ve Divested From The Oil Sands

Why I’ve Divested From The Oil Sands

What do sub-prime mortgages, Atlantic-salmon dinners, SUVs, and globalization have in common? They all depend on cheap oil. Jeff Rubin, one of the world’s most prominent experts on the future of “black gold,” explains why the end of cheap supply means the end of easy answers to renewing prosperity—and the end of globalization as we now know it. Rubin was the former Chief Economist at CIBC World Markets (for almost 20 years), is a frequent columnist for The Globe and Mail, and is the bestselling author of Why Your World Is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller, and The End of Growth. In this new column in The Globe, Jeff writes about why he’s divested from the oil sands:

Adherents of index investing in Canada have had a rough month as falling oil prices have inflicted considerable pain on not just the energy sector but the entire Canadian market. After surveying the landscape I’ve finally thrown in the towel on the TSX and switched my investing allegiance south of the border to the less oily S&P 500.

Look back over the last few years and the biggest challenge facing oil sands producers would certainly seem to be the inability to get a major new pipeline project approved that would allow the industry to sell its ever expanding production to new markets. Now, however, falling oil prices are changing the conversation that Big Oil is having with the rest of the country about the need to build more pipeline infrastructure. At today’s oil prices, the expected doubling of oil sands production over the next decade just isn’t in the cards. If oil sands output isn’t going up then where exactly is the impetus to break ground on a new pipeline? Indeed, the more relevant issue facing oil sands investors at the moment isn’t about how production from northern Alberta might be expanded, but whether the industry’s current level of production is sustainable.

When OPEC’s decision to keep output quotas unchanged triggered the current slide in oil prices, energy investors around the world began pointing to any number of conspiracy theories that would explain why the oil cartel wouldn’t move to safeguard prices. Just why anyone would think it’s incumbent on the lowest cost producers in the world, such as Saudi Arabia, to cut production remains unclear.

At current prices, the Saudis are still making a decent margin on every barrel sold. The same can’t be said for producers with higher costs, many of whom will soon be squeezed out of the market. Consider Canada’s oil sands producers. They’re churning out some of the highest cost oil in the world, while at the same time they’re fetching one of the lowest prices for every barrel sold. Light sweet crude from a shallow well in Texas fetches a much better price from refiners than the heavy sludge that’s being delivered from Canada’s oil sands. It’s one of the reasons why the benchmark price of oil sands crude trades at such a considerable discount to the price of West Texas Intermediate.

If oil prices stay at their current levels, North American producers will have to start making choices about whether or not to shut in production. If they don’t, they run the risk of exacerbating the current glut in world oil markets, which would cause oil prices to fall even further. It’s a situation that’s reminiscent of the one faced by the global coal industry, which has had to contend with an equally challenging collapse in commodity prices.

Consider the chart of an exchange-traded fund that tracks oil sands players, in this case BlackRock’s iShares Oil Sands ETF. Since hitting a peak prior to the last recession, it’s lost about two-thirds of its value. If oil sands stocks follow the same path as that of fallen stars of the U.S. coal industry, such as Peabody Energy or Arch Coal, their share prices could end up falling by 80 to 90 per cent from their highs before the oil market stabilizes at a much lower price level.

That dismal outlook isn’t just a problem for investors who hold Suncor, Cenovus, Imperial Oil, Canadian Natural Resources and the like. Canada’s biggest oil sands players also number among the country’s largest companies of any type. The oil sands is now a large component of Canada’s energy sector, which means it’s also an outsized part of the entire TSX Composite Index. Indeed, the energy sector is second only to the financial sector in terms of its weighting in the index. That huge imprint on the TSX means that plunging oil prices are a problem for anyone who owns the broad Canadian market.

By Jeff Rubin/Globe and Mail/December, 2014